Testing the waterproofs

admin — Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:32:35 +0000

My Montane Lakeland 100 t-shirt is probably my favourite top. In fact I like it so much I recently went out and bought another just like it (without the Lakeland logo of course). They are a great fit, they feel substantial enough for the winter and yet are cool enough for running in summer. What’s that got to do with waterproofs I hear you asking, well while I was buying the t-shirt I couldn’t resist picking up a Montane Atomic Jacket.

The week after making this purchase we were hit by some of the worst storms we’d had in decades, with widespread flooding across the region. What better opportunity to but my new jacket to the test. Heading over to the Lakes the roads started to look like rivers, the drains unable to clear the driving rain as quickly as it was falling. As I parked at Pooley Bridge I watched a group of walkers from the car in front make their way over the road and onto the fells, my the time i’d changed into my fell shoes and checked my bag, they were crossing back over the road having decided it was too wet for walking. I ran the 10 miles to just short of Mardale Head via Howtown and then back again. The rain stopped for a while as I made my way up from Howtown to the Roman Road, but by that time like my fell shoes my base layer was pretty wet.

Unsure as to whether it was the weather or simply sweat that had caused this dampness I contacted Montane via there facebook page to ask ‘how waterproof a water proof should be’. Montane’s customer service was quite excellent. They posted a response almost immediately offering to test the jacket for me. I replied saying that I was actually more interested in finding out about the tech specs than returning the jacket. The response was a fantastic post detailing water resistance and breathability across their jacket range.

Basically there are 4 things to look out for when buying a running water proof.

Weight
Size
Hydrostatic Head
Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate (MVTR).

Obviously weight makes a difference as you have to carry it, as does size, you need to get in in your pack (when your not running in it).

Hydrostatic Head is basically how high a column of water you need before droplets of water start to seep through a sample of the fabric stretch across the bottom of a tube of 1 inch diameter left for 24 hours. The problem with this measures is it does not take into account factors like wind driving rain through the fabric, or the fabric rubbing against wet vegitation, your arms or pack. As a minimum european waterproofs have to have a Hydrostatic Head of 1500mm to resist light showers, but as activities just as kneeling can add up to 8000mm. So for use in active sports a fabric would have to be able to withstand at least 10,000mm to resist heavy rain and driving wind.

[The Atomic has 10,000mm while the Minimus 20,000 and Classic GoreTex 28,000mm]

Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate is a measure of a fabrics breathability, or the amount of water vapour the fabric will allow out in 24 hours. The average person will produce between 0.5 and 1L of sweat during 30 minutes of moderate to heavy exercise, depending on a number of factors like how hot it is, whether there’s a breeze, how many layers the person is wearing, how fit they are etc. If you multiply this by 48 you get to between 24 and 48L which is the sort of Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate that would be needed to keep dry under these condition. The Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate therefore as important if not more so than the Hydrostatic Head. After all there’s not much use in stopping water getting in, if your already wet on the inside.

[The Atomic has a MVTR of 8000g, the Minimus 20,000g]

So it was probably the Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate of the Atomic at 8000g that caused me to get wet on my run and not the Hydrostatic Head at 10,000mm. It would seem that I may have been better of spending a little more and buying something like the Air at 20,000mm and 21,000g which is better suited to the requirements of running in these more extreme conditions.

Looking back I could have done a couple of things to ensure I stayed drier longer. Firstly I could have taken a base layer off when I put the water proof on. I was warm enough running without the jacket, so adding an additional layer just made me sweat more. I could have also tried to reduced the amount of pressure on the fabric by not brushing past vegetation as I ran or adjusting my back pack so the straps didn’t flap against the jacket.

Even by English summer standards we’ve seen some pretty extreme weather this year, which has been wet enough to put any waterproofs to the test…So if you like running in the rain but not necessarily getting soaked to the skin, then my advice would be…go for the highest MVTR rating you can afford when buying your next running waterproof .

Choosing my next big challenge.

admin — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:08:28 +0000

Last year I went from running the odd marathon to tackling something altogether bigger, the Himalayan 100, a 100 mile multi day stage race at altitude. But what could I do to follow an event like that?

Well for me it meant looking at Ultra Marathons. The furthest I’d run up until this stage has around 30 miles (and that was largely downhill). An Ultra then will be something of a new challenge.

There is no real definition of what an ultra marathon is, other than being longer than a regular marathon. Common distances can be 50k, 50miles, 52 miles (double marathon), 100km or 100miles.

Ultras like marathons are becoming increasingly popular. There are over 125 Ultras here in the UK many of which can be found on ultramarathonrunning.com or a variety of other website. There are also some great online communities of ultra runners on sites like dailymile.com where you can get information on gear, training schedules and fueling stratergies.

While we tend to think of all of these distances as simply ultras, each ultra has a unique character of its own, with different terrains, with different levels of ascent and decent, taking part at different times of year and with different levels of support.

So the question is with so many different Ultra’s to pick from which would I choose as my first . Should I start small and work my way up. Should I go for something relatively flat or something a bit more challenging with more hills. Should I choose something nearby or make a break of it and go further afield.

In the end the choice was simple, as I didn’t really have to make it.

My roommate from the Himalayian 100, Paul Stoneley sent me an email saying that he’d been looking at a race called the Lakeland 50, a 50 mile race across the Lake District in Late July that you could run individually or as a team of two, and did I fancy running it. I didn’t even have to thing about it, the answer right away was yes. A couple of days later Paul realized that it was during his summer holidays and he couldn’t in fact make it, but my this time it was too late the idea was in my head, and I was going to run.

Over the next couple of weeks, I spoke to a few of the other runners that I’d ran with in India and both Iryna and Dianne said that they were interested in running the Lakeland, but they were more interested in the 100 miler than the 50.

Last year only 20 in 100 of those setting out on the Lakeland 100 made it to the finish line, but Iryna and Diane made the argument that with 14 checkpoints over the 100 miles, I could drop out at any point and I still would have ran further than I had ever ran before.

Its a completely crazy idea, not only to choose a 100 miler for my first ultra, but to choose one ran over grueling conditions and that will see us running through the night twice, if we stay the distance.

But for better or worse the choice for my first ultra has been made…and in July i’m running the Lakeland 100.

Davidcoxon.com/run » Lakeland 100

Testing the waterproofs

Choosing my next big challenge.